For to everyone who has will more be given, and he will have an abundance. But from the one who has not, even what he has will be taken away. -- Matthew 25:29
Consider the KJV which skips the implied “more” -- For unto every one that hath shall be given,
and he shall have abundance …. That
sounds strange to us because the verbs “give” and “have” usually involve
possession and transaction. We may have
something in our hearts or give love. It
isn’t necessarily visible or tangible, but it is something.
We might conclude from the text that there really are two
kinds of people in the world: the havers
and not-havers -- a little different from the Haves and the Have-nots. Not-havers are people who are not having any
of this God-stuff, though they may be Haves in terms of wealth and prestige. In fact, I would guess that not-havers are
over-represented percentage-wise among the Haves. Havers may have wealth and material
possessions, even in abundance, but they will be tend to be counted among the
Have-nots by the world.
It’s kind of like weeds and wheat, and we don’t really know
which is which. We should be careful of
judging too early:
And he told this parable: “A man had a fig tree planted in his vineyard, and he came seeking fruit on it and found none. And he said to the vinedresser, ‘Look, for three years now I have come seeking fruit on this fig tree, and I find none. Cut it down. Why should it use up the ground?’ And he answered him, ‘Sir, let it alone this year also, until I dig around it and put on manure. Then if it should bear fruit next year, well and good; but if not, you can cut it down.’” (Luke 13:6-9)
Some of us are just late in revealing whether we have or do
not have. Some, like the fig tree Jesus
cursed, look good early but are shown to be fruitless in the end. It may be that our environment hinders us, or
we could be genetically inclined to late-bearing. I am no Calvinist, but we can’t dismiss determinism
by arguing that people change. This is
what Jesus means when He said, “Judge not.”
If a woman is getting paid for sex, she is a whore. If a man sticks a gun in my face and takes my
wallet, he’s a thief – or from the government.
Jesus doesn’t have any problem with us saying that a present action is
right or wrong. He is telling us that we
don’t know yet if the whore and the
thief are havers or not-havers. In fact,
it may be our condemnation of their behavior which provides the necessary
cultivation for them to blossom and bear good fruit.
I am a one-talent man.
What I have is pretty basic. I
have a life God gave me. I don’t have
any gifts, any artistic or musical ability.
I’m not called to any ministry. I
am remarkably average. The danger for a
guy like me is that I would think what little I have is not worth investing for
the kingdom. It doesn’t matter. I can sit here on the pew or in front of the
television, and it is no big deal one way or the other.
But I will give account to God for how I spent – that’s
right, spent my life. What did I
gain? Did I take a risk for the kingdom
or did I hide my insignificant existence, keeping it wrapped up, clean and
sterile, in a diaper somewhere? Maybe I
buried it – which is very different from sowing it. There are people calling themselves Christians,
living lukewarm lives, standing before the judgment and saying, “Here’s the
life that You gave me, Lord -- just like it was. I didn’t mess it up or lose it or even get it
very dirty. You can have back what is
Yours.”
I believe I would rather be on my knees crying, “Lord, have
mercy on me. I didn’t have much to work
with, and I wasn’t smart enough or strong enough to do much with it. I have nothing to show for the talent – the
life You gave me. I traded it for seed
that I planted, but whether it will grow or not, I do not know.”
No comments:
Post a Comment