Then Jesus said to His disciples, “If anyone wants to come with Me, he must deny himself, take up his cross, and follow Me. For whoever wants to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life because of Me will find it. What will it benefit a man if he gains the whole world yet loses his life? Or what will a man give in exchange for his life? – Matthew 16:24-26
Far be it from me to judge anyone else’s soul or relationship to God, because, after all, Jesus said, “Judge not.” So if a person says they believe in “God and all that” and wants to kill babies, molest children, commit adultery, marry someone of the same sex – as long as they also believe that they should be able to take my property from me at the point of the government’s guns and give it to some ACORN-registered crack whore – I really am not allowed to question their Christianity. Or their patriotism. Or any corrupt unconstitutional plan they come up with if it’s accompanied by the words "for the greater good", "it’s for the children", "to fight global warming", or "to provide healthcare for the disadvantaged".
I probably also can’t remind them that the same Man who said, “Judge not,” said, “By their fruits shall ye know them.”
Apparently the Lord has been to San Francisco.
A sign of the times is that I am beginning to look back fondly upon the ‘90’s. As I was reminiscing about pagers and Windows 3.11, I recalled someone talking about the good ol’ Groper-in-Chief, Bill Clinton. After admitting that Clinton’s personal morals were somewhat lacking, the defender stated that Clinton was probably the most “publically moral” president in history. This is a valid point to the leftists who believe that “doing good” trumps being good. They can make Edward Kennedy one of their saints if they like, but I’m not riding with anybody who has a statue of him dangling from the rearview mirror.
Collectivists – including Christian collectivists – are always concerned about “the world”. They want to save the world. The Christian variety wants to make the church compatible and accepting of the world. They all want reform, education, and material prosperity. Their answer is to dress up the old man in new clothes.
Jesus says the answer is a new man. The goal of Christianity is not a better world but better people. The only righteousness that counts is personal righteousness. The group is never holy, only the individual. Weighed against a single human soul, the world is as nothing.
Yes, I used to want to change the world, too. I wanted abortion outlawed. I wanted abstinence taught in schools. I wanted kids to be able to pray at football games and graduations. Then one day it dawned on me that abortion didn’t need to be outlawed, it needed to be unnecessary – not because we were teaching kindergarteners about condom use, but because children were growing up in godly homes with their own two biological parents. Abstinence wouldn’t need to be taught in schools if the right understanding of God’s principles were instilled in children by their parents and their church. And one thing anyone can always do anywhere is pray.
We don’t need Christians to take over the government, necessarily. I’m not saying Christians shouldn’t vote, participate in the public square, or serve in public office. But government is never going to be the vehicle for fixing the world’s problems. The function of government is solely to allow us to peaceably pursue the will of God for our own individual lives – to both practice and preach the Gospel without interference.
The state is the god of the left. Obedience to man’s law or even to the rule of the despot is more appealing to the flesh than obedience to the Divine law. The great fear of the left is the establishment of a theocracy. Admittedly, there are probably a few people on the right like the late Jerry Falwell who would not be altogether opposed to doing some legislating of morals. Most of us, though, would be quite content with simply a truly neutral government and also a minimal government. We know that a utopia of the unregenerate is just another name for hell.
5 comments:
"Yes, I used to want to change the world, too."
Yep, me too. Until I realized how I responded when having to change and do what someone in authority said I needed to - I didn't change, I went along with... while I had to... to the extent that I had to - and the devil was certainly in those details,
"We know that a utopia of the unregenerate is just another name for hell."
Yep. That ain't change, that's just more of the same under different appearances.
The only true change that can come about, is through change that is chosen and made from within, and that only happens through a persons willingly educating their own self.
You may be able to persuade some one to do that, but there's no way to impose or force it upon them.
It's not a quick fix plan, but it's the only one that can work.
Well said, Van.
"And one thing anyone can always do anywhere is pray."
Amen to that. That's what I am hanging onto.
I've been reading C. S. Lewis lately. He was leery of too many prayers that leave all the work to God and other people.
And what's to be done in the meantime, before the inner change comes about? C.S. writes:
The very activities for which we were created are, while we live on earth, variously impeded: by evil in ourselves or in others. Not to practice them is to abandon our humanity.
To practice them spontaneously and delightfully is not yet possible. This situation creates the category of duty, the whole specifically moral realm.
It exists to be transcended.
Here is the paradox of Christianity. As practical imperatives for here and now, the
two great commandments have to be translated "Behave as if you loved God and man." For no man can love because he is told to.
Yet obedience on this practical level is not really obedience at all. And if a man really loved God and man, once again this would hardly be obedience; for if he did, he would be unable to help it. Thus the command really says to us, "Ye must be born again."
Till then, we have duty, morality, the Law. A
schoolmaster, as St. Paul says, is to bring us to Christ. We must expect no more of it than of a schoolmaster; we must allow it no less.
He was leery of too many prayers that leave all the work to God and other people
This is my complaint about people who tend to say "let go and let God" a lot. The mass of people and the world is beyond me, and, yes, I have to leave that mostly to God. But there are things within my reach that need to be addressed. I assume God does expect me to take care of those, not by the flesh, but by His grace and power within me. I can do all things through Christ.
Post a Comment