Perhaps it may turn out a sang,
Perhaps turn out a sermon.

-- R. Burns Epistle to a Young Friend

Tuesday, May 15, 2012

Bummer of a Birthmark -- Samson, Part 3


And Samson said to them, “If this is what you do, I swear I will be avenged on you, and after that I will quit.”  And he struck them hip and thigh with a great blow, and he went down and stayed in the cleft of the rock of Etam. – Judges 15:7-8

These days the United States has to fight what are called “asymmetrical” wars.  It is somewhat confusing to call them wars at all.  These are not defined battles over land masses by uniformed combatants.  Identifying the enemy and the objective is often difficult.  The distinction between combatants and non-combatants is unclear.   The same is true with us when it comes to spiritual warfare, and Samson’s troubles with the Philistines typify our own.

Samson did not clearly understand that he was in a war.  From his perspective, he was just going about life, wanting to get married and raise a family with a little Philistine hottie.  After his disrupted wedding feast, the girl’s father had given her in marriage to another man thinking that Samson had decided she no longer pleased him.  When Samson returned for her and found out the situation had changed, he avenged himself upon the Philistines by setting fire to their grain fields and olive groves.

This was strictly a personal feud, Samson thought.  He was not striking a blow for the liberation of his nation.  He was just mad about losing his wife.  He did not consider the larger implications of his actions.  He did not see himself as leading a rebellion or harassing the enemy of his people.  His goal was vengeance, an evening of the score.  The Philistines, however, took it differently.  Upon learning that Samson – still considered the son-in-law of his former bride’s father – had perpetrated the destruction of their property, the Philistines exacted their revenge.  They put the woman and her family to death by fire.  This act led Samson to swear he would have his revenge. 

It might seem foolish to us for Samson to think that his actions would not provoke further retaliation to the point of his saying, … and after that I will quit.  At the very beginning our struggle was initiated:  I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and her offspring; he shall bruise your head, and you shall bruise his heel (Genesis 3:15).  Like Samson, we may think we can walk away from trouble, but that is not how it works.  In the world you will have tribulation, Jesus promised us. 

The promise of peace and joy is for the heart, independent of circumstances.  No one who in any way goes about the Lord’s business should expect anything other than constant harassment and attacks from the enemy.  

Bummer of a birthmark, Hal.  Being born from above means that we are targeted -- that we have, like poor Hal, a bullseye painted on us.  As long as Samson left his hair uncut, he was empowered by God, but it was also a red flag waved at the enemy, an open taunt to the adversary. 

I don’t remember signing up for this.  For some reason, they didn’t spend a whole lot of time on this subject in Sunday School.  Perhaps I was absent or dozing that day.  I have offered my resignation several times, but it has, apparently, been rejected.  And when your position is surrounded by a vindictive force hell-bent on your destruction and humiliation, desertion isn’t much of an option lest one end up eyeless in Gaza, as Huxley said.  The positive alternative is to cling to God’s promise that the trial will not be beyond our ability to endure.  (Seriously, I am not that tough.)  There is, though, no retreat, no holding the fort, no truce. 

I think my confusion might come from the truth that Christ has been victorious over all the power of the enemy.  Through the Holy Spirit, I am able to participate in that victory.  In The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe there is a scene after Aslan’s death and resurrection where He goes into the “trophy room” of the witch’s fortress and quickens all the creatures turned to stone.  They do not go on a picnic.  Instead they rush into the battle.  We are given life and power to fight.  To be partakers of Christ’s victory means to follow Him into battle.  As Rick noted in a comment a couple of days ago, the crucifixion of Christ is eternal, as is His resurrection, as is His victory.

When we receive the new and eternal life – the only kind God has to give us – we are released from bondage and enter in as combatants to that eternal struggle.  As Christ overcame, so we must overcome through Him and in Him.    

8 comments:

julie said...

:D

As soon as I saw the title, I had to laugh. We used to have that particular cartoon on a coffee mug. Now to read the actual post...

julie said...

As to the rest of the post, I can only agree. Another good one, Mush.

mushroom said...

It is one of my favorites. Larson was great.

mushroom said...

...he went down and stayed in the cleft of the rock of Etam

"Cleft of the rock" is a phrase familiar to us from the Psalms and, in Christian thinking, is a figurative way of saying we are in Christ, or hidden in Christ.

While it speaks of security and safety for the spirit, it does not mean we are free from conflict and confrontation. Etam seems to have been located in the territory of Judah, and the Philistines threatened that tribe with retaliation unless they turned Samson over. The Philistines were not eager to go down to the cleft and face Samson themselves. It was a strong position to hold for an ordinary warrior, let alone someone like Samson.

Judah sent a delegation to Etam to coax Samson out of his lair in order to spare them an attack by the Philistine forces. Samson agreed to be bound and delivered by the men of Judah, provided they promised not to kill him themselves. They agreed, which led to another well-known situation.

Etam, by the way, means "lair" or "den" -- most interpreters add "of a wild beast", which is rather redundant.

John Lien said...

Good one Mush. This battle you describe. I see it as being everywhere at all levels. Personal struggles to do the right thing (that's probably the bulk of the fighting right there), taking the unpopular stance among peers in defense of the truth, on up to religious war if necessary. Can't avoid it, can you? You can fight as long as you are conscious even though you are aged and feeble. This is our part in bringing about His Kingdom. (It's hard to discuss this without sounding all preachy.) Is this the same battle you are refering to?

mushroom said...

I think so. As individuals, we often think that our struggles are personal, and they are -- but our victories and our failures have a greater significance on a larger scale.

Samson was a little cantankerous, a little arrogant, at times. He was a prankster. He kept seeing the conflict at his level, the personal feud. But he's part of a much grander plan that is going to involve Samuel, Saul, and, eventually, David in creating and expanding the Kingdom of Israel. Samson's job is more or less just to stir up strife. It doesn't seem like a very "godly" calling, but it was necessary.

Rick said...

Great post, indeed, Mush.
As to not signing up for this, that was a gift I apparently needed. No one talked me into it. And I didn't find my way there by logic or debate. (The Reality just so happens, as it should, to be able to stand up to those things.) If someone had talked me into it,I might be more inclined to believe I could talk someone else into it too. And believe me, even with the gift, it is a difficult temptation for me to not try and talk people into God. So I try in other ways. By example, by drawing rather than pushing. That's not to say my role is better, it just seems to be the one asked of me. That's a kind of war and John's talking about it.

Rick said...

I've been reading David Berlinski's book The Devil's Delusion and rarely have I had a book I can't put down. He is a fine writer and a kind of wit like Bob has. Even the organization and process of his debate reminds of Bob's book. Anyway, he is never out of character. By that I mean he insists he is a secular Jew. I suppose he's being truthful. Or maybe just clever. I think it may be just a device he uses to drive his opponents crazy. Not unlike (although unconscious) the device of his opponents -- they deny God and go to remarkable lengths to deny Him. Foolish lengths, in that Berlinski so easily makes mince meat of them with their own weapons. He may be precisely a secular Jew, but he may be something else as well. I don't believe he has ever said he was an atheist. He really twists the knife every time he spells God with a capital G and H for him. I love it.