Perhaps it may turn out a sang,
Perhaps turn out a sermon.

-- R. Burns Epistle to a Young Friend

Monday, July 12, 2010

Following Jesus for Fun and Profit

When you eat and are full, and build beautiful houses to live in, and your herds and flocks grow large, and your silver and gold multiply, and everything else you have increases, be careful that your heart doesn't become proud and you forget the LORD your God who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the place of slavery. -- Deuteronomy 8:12-14

When I was a kid, we sang hymns in church and little choruses in Sunday School and Vacation Bible School. Even hour or so on KWTO, someone would sing a "sacred song" in between the ordinary run of hillbilly music. When KWTO was still broadcasting live music radio shows, the performers would often close with a gospel song. On television, the "Ozark Jubilee" always included the performance of a gospel number, usually by Red Foley. Tennessee Ernie Ford typically sang a sacred song on his show. Porter Wagoner always did one.

As far as preaching and teaching in mass media, there was, of course, the broadcast of Billy Graham crusades. Many local pastors had brief spots on the secular radio station. Philip Wannemaker, the long-time pastor of Central Assembly — the "mother church" of the Assemblies of God, did a five-minute devotional every weekday morning during a local break in the "Today Show". I had the privilege of talking to Brother Wannemaker on the phone once when I lived in Texas about an entirely different matter, and I mentioned that I well-remembered those carefully crafted sermon miniatures. They were just enough to nudge one into thinking a little about God to start the day.

Now things are very different. There are Christian television and radio networks that blanket many regions of the country, especially in the Bible Belt. On the FM band of my Sangean ATS 818, I can pick up, I think, eight all-Christian stations between 88 and 92. I can pick up two or three daytime AM stations, probably some more at night. I don't prowl shortwave as much as I did before the internet, but there used to several Christian/patriot broadcasts out there as well. Now that I'm off satellite, I can only pick up the Daystar network on television, but that still gives me access to Christian programming 24 hours a day. Satellite and cable customers can be swamped by the Gospel.

With so much teaching, preaching, and singing being pumped through the airwaves, not to mention the webs, why aren't Christians stronger and more resistant to corruption by the culture? The divorce rate among Christians is as higher or higher than among non-Christians. Pastors and Christian leaders continue to fall to scandals. We lack power, and we lack peace.

I would suggest that perhaps it is the very glut of teaching that causes part of our problem. See, Christian broadcasting, like everything else, has to be funded. Most Christian radio stations run programs from various ministries. Those ministries pay for the stations' airtime. The ministries are, in turn, funded by donations, love-offerings, or the sale of ministry products such as books and CD's. Now these ministries are not like me. I try not to pay attention to the number of hits I get for a particular topic. I generate the same revenue for 1 hit as for 20 or 30. When I check things it is just for curiosity's sake. My post ranting against all things Janis Ian, and a post on a Hayek quote called "Why the Worst Get on Top" probably generate the most new traffic. I could, possibly, get more attention on the internet if I did more talking about popular culture figures I don't like and posted more quotes from The Road to Serfdom. But I can afford not to do that. Ministries that depend on donations cannot be so cavalier. They have to pay attention to topics that generate offerings and orders. They may not hit those topics all the time, but they will certainly keep them in the rotation. And there is nothing wrong with that, except — except that all too often those are not the kinds of things that really move the listeners closer to God.

My guess is that practical topics — how to raise better kids, have a better marriage, have more money, more peace, more answered prayers, etc. — are more popular than deep theological discussions. That's a fairly educated guess because we usually have a Christian radio program on while we're eating, and we often watch whatever is on Daystar in the evenings before going to sleep. Even when the teacher is dealing with weighter topics like atonement or Christ's indwelling, we are usually told how this makes our lives better. Not that there's anything wrong with that.

At least, not at first. After a while, though, if all we hear is how God is interested in making our lives better and better, we might start thinking that Christianity is really all about us. So we look for a church that has lots to offer us and the kids. We complain if we don't get anything out of the "praise and worship".

Somehow, somewhere, we have missed the point that the worship service isn't for us. This is less, much less, of a problem in Catholic and Orthodox churches, I'm sure, although I have heard some of my Catholic friends express sentiments that sound as if they might not get it all the time either. Still, evangelical Christians are the worst offenders in this regard. We give, often very generously, because we are told that we will be repaid. We are much more rarely told that giving is not to enrich us or even to build a shiny new multipurpose family activity ministry center, but primarily to acknowledge our dependent relationship with our Father.

Paradoxically, I think evangelicals probably start out better than any other tradition. The reason for that is that we preach salvation by grace, and, mostly, the helpless sinfulness of man apart from Christ and the Cross. Because we cannot save ourselves, our deliverance depends entirely upon a relationship with Christ. It is this relational understanding of salvation that underpins the initial joy many experience in forgiveness and reconciliation with God. Unfortunately, shortly after that, all this "teaching" kicks in, and we start looking to God, not in a relational way, but in a manipulative way. We begin to hear how thanksgiving pleases God, so we give thanks. We hear how God inhabits the praises of His people, so we praise. What begins as seeking after God too frequently leads us to seek for something through God, and it is our popular, practical teaching that contributes to this.

I can't tell you the number of "Seven Steps to Answered Prayer"-type formulas I've heard — more than seven, for sure. New Christians, in particular, eat this stuff up, but it's like trying to live on Oreos. Sure, people like it, and it will draw a crowd, and everyone will be excited afterward. But when a couple of hours have passed, and you have to push the truck out of the ditch, the sugar buzz has left you flat. Cornbread and beans may not be as exciting part of the time, but you're still going at the end of the row.

Of course, there are individuals in all traditions, including evangelicals who grasp that Christianity is supposed to be relational. Prayer is meant to be a vehicle whereby we get God, not get from God. God welcomes our petitions and intercession, but only when we have our relationship with Him at the core of our lives.

Perhaps our Father intends for us to work through things this way. It's not altogether unlike the normal pattern between a child and parent. At first, we are thrilled just to have Daddy around. He romps and plays and makes us smile. We are filled with joy when he walks in the door and rush into his arms to tell him all about whatever has happened. As we grow older, sometimes we lose a little of that joy in just being around him. He becomes the one who disciplines us. He is the one we go to for ice cream money or new shoes or car keys. Now we may still appreciate him, but we appreciate him for what he does for us.

But still later many of us come back, and we are happy to just be in the same room with him. We are content to hear his voice, to listen as he talks — not because he tells us something new and exciting, but because it's his voice. And so it is with some of us whom God has blessed.

We've been out there enjoying life and doing whatever it is that we should or shouldn't be doing. We're getting by OK, but there's a nagging feeling that something might be missing. We find a quiet spot and just start talking. Then we pause and listen. Just because it's His voice.

8 comments:

robinstarfish said...

Oh, Daystar. Let me count the ways I loathe thee.

Our local cable provider plunked Daystar right on Channel 3 - a savvy marketing move on Daystar's part - so that every time you turn on the telly, there it is. You can't help but watch once in awhile, but it's much like watching a slow motion train wreck, fascinating and horrifying at the same time.

I'd go off on a rant, but then I'd not get any work done the rest of the day. ;-)

Anyway, I wish there was even one voice of reason like yours on Daystar, but I'm not that much of a dreamer.

mushroom said...

Check out this site and find which famous writer you are.

Give them several paragraphs if you have it.

My style varies.

The bad news is, today's entry came up as "You write like Dan Brown".

The good news is that I tried "Honey and Chicken" post and got "You write like J.R.R. Tolkien".

mushroom said...

I will put up, usually, with James Robison and I can zone out enough to endure my wife's favorite, Joyce Meyer.

But Marcus and Joni are too much, even for my wife. It is hard to imagine how people who can see themselves on television can be so incredibly unaware of how they appear.

Unknown said...

Funny, I was going to ask Bob, since he used the word charity today, if he thought or had read maybe that charity might actually be an act of love by God to the giver as well. Sort of a triune nature to it. In other words, does God (1) in a sense plea out of love for me (2) to give to another (3) for it will, say, fill the receiver of the charity and the giver with the Holy Spirit?
So that the "feeling good" about it by the giver wasn't just some by product - but maybe even the point?

robinstarfish said...

Uh oh. Arthur Conan Doyle, Chuck Palahniuk, and HP Lovecraft. Apparently I need to quit writing in the dark.

mushroom said...

I wondered around Providence quite a bit a few years ago, but I never thought to see if I could find Lovecraft's house. Rhode Island has a lovecraftian vibe for me. Maybe it's just the mysterious lack of access roads for the freeway. Every offramp is an adventure.

mushroom said...

Rick, your question reminds me of how MacDonald addressed the issue of prayer.

“But if God is so good as you represent Him, and if he knows all that we need, and better far than we do ourselves, why should it be necessary to ask Him for anything?”

I answer, What if He knows Prayer to be the thing we need first and most? What if the main object in God’s idea of prayer be the supplying of our great, our endless need–the need of Himself?… Hunger may drive the runaway child home, and he may or may not be fed at once, but he needs his mother more than his dinner. Communion with God is the one need of the soul beyond all other need: prayer is the beginning of that communion, and some need is the motive of that prayer… So begins a communion, a taking with God, a coming-to-one with Him, which is the sole end of prayer, yea, of existence itself in its infinite phases. We must ask that we may receive: but hat we should receive what we ask in respect of our lower needs, is not God’s end in making us pray, for He could give us everything without that: to bring His child to his knee, God withholds that man may ask.

~George MacDonald, Why Should It Be Necessary #91

Unknown said...

Interesting, Mushroom. I've thought about that part of prayer--God knows all this, why do I have to pray it? For the time being I've decided I learn more about the prayed for thing or the problem while in the focused act of prayer. Often, I end up changing what I thought I should pray for. Most times, for only understanding.